What do you think this study is about?
This study was about personal judgements and behavioral study.
I have no idea. Leadership perceptions about opposition groups preferences?
how we think of leaders with very little information
How we perceive leaders based on how the opposition reacts to them.
Our perceptions of what characteristics we see in a leader.
How well people follow leaders and why they choose the leaders they follow
I'm a little confused-- I'll say that I don't think that it's actually about how we evaluate leaders.
How people perceive that leaders would act and the qualities people look for in their leaders.
Peoples ideas on what a leader should be.
What we as American citizens believe makes a good leader.
How people choose between two choices where both are the same with the only thing difference between them being the letters A and B.
My views on leaders and how they relate to groups.
leadership qualities compared to politics
see why people would pick one of 2 candidates when no information about either was presented.
Which letter we would associate more with a leader.
This survey is evaluating the qualities we look for in a leader. What characteristics make a good leader.
The ability to imagine and perceive characteristics of a leader and a group with the most minimal of information
I think that this study is about how people will, given a fairly open scenario and not much information, choose a leader and actually "create" the ideal leader with their responses.
Interesting. I am a rule follower, so it was easy to choose the leader I thought would represent me best.
If people think willingness to negotiate makes someone a bad leader.
What perceptions people have on the characteristics of a leader
Perhaps how peoples' ideas about a good leader relate to their ideals and standards
It is about evaluating leaders based on limited information available.
Leadership and why people follow someone.
what decisions we make with limited information. whether we are fluffers or spikers in general.
How people judge a leader based on limited information and how that relates to their own self perception.
how people feel about different kinds of protest related to leadership
Seeing what subject decide when given limited amount of information about a person and a cause.
The study is about people's perceptions of other people and their attributes and how these perceptions, form their opinions and decisions.
To see what you preceive to be a leader without information
Something related to how leadership's personality is perceived.
selecting the best leader in comparison to our own personality (fluffy vs spiky)
Team leaders and what makes us like them more or less.
To find out how people would evaluate a potential leader with little information to go on.
How do people view leadership and the group dynamic?
how people evaluate and judge leadership qualities
Understanding how people make choices and form opinions of someone without receiving a lot of information about the person.
How different styles of leadership affect group dynamics.
Evaluating leader characteristics and effectiveness.
Its about preferences between negotiation/collaboration and confrontation to effect change. My perceptions as to the characteristics of an effective leader for my group reflect how I myself do and would lead.
How people perceive different leaders with very little information.
How people decide on how to choose a leader with little information.
Leadership groups and there effects on peoples beliefs.
I'm not sure. Leadership and group representation and something political.
This study seemed to be about seeing how one would support a leader with absolutely no background information about either A or B. I almost answered all middle ground (favoring neither), but then I decided to go with B more heavily.
To gauge how extreme people would go to demand changed, based on their political ideologies.
Politically motivated actions and/or personality traits that motivate political movements.

Please provide any comments you wish to make about this survey.
I knew nothing about either leader, but my intial bias favored A for no apparent reason. Once I caught on, all my answers were neutral between A and B.
i'm not sure if the study was designed this way or not, but I was forced to choose randomly between A and B because no information about either person was given.
Weird. There weren't any details about leader A or B at the beginning.
I think the survey would of been better if you provided an opportunity to explain your answers of why you would choose each leader.
So hard to make decisions based on such limited information, but definitely interesting and thought provoking. Best of luck with your research.
I found it challenging and uniquely interesting. It was quite thought provoking and forced me to reflect on some of those leadership characteristics that I rarely think about. The survey was comprehensive as to goal it wanted to achieve and also short, ad to the point.
With the lack of information, I tried to choose what I embodied this leader as. I hope these were not trick questions as there was not a lot of information invovled.
We make a critical assumption about the other group, That is, they do not like leader A because he will not negotiate to a solution that will be viable for both sides. If this is the case, then my evaluations are correct. However, if their request for leder B is a ploy to gain advantage in the negotiation, then my evaluations as to the effectiveness of leader B are incorrect.
I think the survey may have been broken. The only thing it told me about the leaders was that they were called leader a and leader b. That's it. It didn't give any other information or mention what their leadership styles would be or anything else. I'm usng firefox, if it matters.
I got no information at all about either candidate, just that they were candidates. So I picked more randomly than anything. I answered in the middle intentionally for many questions. Not having any information I had no idea what anyone represented or howthey related to my group. And its not my style politically at all to go on is a situation where I would not choose at all rather than choose randomly or wrongly so it seemed like an unnatural sort of choice. I wonder if I am part of the control group, theone expected to give answers closest to neutral or randomly?
I hope my answers are helpful in your research