What do you think this study is about?
Would leaders be more effective if the negotiate
Perceptions of leadership strategies and of how we view others
What quality or qualities are most likely to influence our choice for leadership.
to see if people would want to work with the opposition when the opposition doesn't like us.
Determining what the response of the average person would be in time of crisis.
How I would want my group to proceed when dealing with others?
See how people think about political groups.
To see what people think about certain group strategies based on their politcal ideals.
It was about how well a person can read and make decisions.
Seeing how conservative my political views are and how radical I would get to support a cause. This was a measure to see what camp I would be in of I was in a political group and who I would follow.
I think this study is trying to understand how different leaders motivate groups and the impact when the leader's strategy aligns with the group's strategy.
Evaluating the effectiveness of leaders.
I'm not sure. Maybe it's trying to see if the average person is more in favor of negotiation over opposition/war.
Seeing if negotiation is more important than standing by your beliefs.
The psychology of political identification
How team leaders can be effected by their own desires instead of the group members.
Political affiliation and tendency to negotiate.
It's studying the perceived usefulness of negotiation.
Personal feelings regarding how to be most effective against an opposing group (force or negotiation?)
what political strategies different people are okay with.
choosing a leader based on a scenario where a group has to decide the best course of action
what kinda leaders we like for our personality
Whether people would find fighting or negotiating more desirable based on their political affiliation
Public opinion on negotiating with enemies or no questions ask mobilizing an army
What different people see as being a good leader.
How we feel about certain leaders and their characteristics.
Leadership styles and character in groups.
Deciding people's opinions and feelings towards groupd leaders based on their circumstances
How people see group leaders and their motives.
Influence of peoples ideas on how leaders think and their ideas.
I am not quite sure. How much acton someone is prepared to take to protect their group?
political policies, different approaches in getting results
How far groups are willing to go to reach their goals.
peoples opinions on leaders negotiating or mobilizing
assumptions about opposing parties goals
I think it was about evaluating different opinions.
how to deal with conflict between groups
I think the study was evaluating peoples opinions on the way leaders behave.
This study is likely to assess how strong the "them-versus-us" idea is among different demographics, and what methods of leadership are most respected.

Please provide any comments you wish to make about this survey.
Very limited information made it difficult to make assumptions. I had to imagine an issue I feel strongly about.
Thank you. best wishes for your continued research.
Thanks for the opportunity to participate and good luck with your research!
I was happy to participate in your very engaging and interesting survey!
The leaders names were too ambiguous and it was too easy to forget which was which.
Personally, I think N is the stronger and more reasonable leader. But, in the situation given, and the small amount of detail, O would be more effective this time, most likely.
I really enjoyed the survey! I would love to participate in future studies. My email is himsheart@hotmail.com
Interesting things to think about... Best of luck with your research!