<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/15663'>
    <docid>15663</docid>
    <rev_number>3</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/51224'>
        <fileid>51224</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>15663</objectid>
        <filename>Fig13_RE_gamma_and_Al4_vs_CFS_v2.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>3ce91de5162b14cb64d84431a400feb8</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>25767</filesize>
        <mtime>2022-02-01 15:57:59</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/64/Fig13_RE_gamma_and_Al4_vs_CFS_v2.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1093</eprintid>
    <pos>64</pos>
    <placement>64</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 13 shows the dependence of &lt;f_{Al(IV)}&gt; as evaluated for R &gt;= 1/3 on the field strength F_M of the M^{3+} ions in aluminosilicate glasses.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig13_RE_gamma_and_Al4_vs_CFS_v2.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
