<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/15664'>
    <docid>15664</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/51226'>
        <fileid>51226</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>15664</objectid>
        <filename>Fig14_RE_f_NBO_comparison_v3.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>903a6c0ebf50dc64282d371e1830c7ec</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>31047</filesize>
        <mtime>2022-02-01 15:58:29</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/65/Fig14_RE_f_NBO_comparison_v3.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1093</eprintid>
    <pos>65</pos>
    <placement>65</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 14 shows a comparison of the measured versus calculated values of f_{NBO} for LaAS, YAS, LuAS and ScAS glasses.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig14_RE_f_NBO_comparison_v3.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
