1093 187 15639 2 51082 document 15639 Fig1_ZAS_NMR_spectra_v3.agr text/plain 71963f3c91aaa1202b281e4dfea6b2fa MD5 25695853 2022-01-18 19:38:10 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/50/Fig1_ZAS_NMR_spectra_v3.agr 1093 50 50 text/plain other Figure 1 shows the ^{27}Al MAS NMR spectra measured for the ZnAS glasses. en public cc_by

Fig1_ZAS_NMR_spectra_v3.agr

data 15640 2 51084 document 15640 Fig2_MAS_NMR_spectra_v3.agr text/plain c68feafefbde106b5e4c3ddb5713faa3 MD5 20861955 2022-01-18 19:38:48 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/51/Fig2_MAS_NMR_spectra_v3.agr 1093 51 51 text/plain other Figure 2 shows the ^{27}Al MAS NMR spectra measured for the MgAS glasses. en public cc_by

Fig2_MAS_NMR_spectra_v3.agr

data 15651 2 51200 document 15651 Fig3a_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v2.agr text/plain ba71698689a18123a56aa229ef0b631d MD5 52346 2022-02-01 15:51:34 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/52/Fig3a_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v2.agr 1093 52 52 text/plain other Figure 3a shows the predictions of the structural model for glassy (M_2O)_x(Al_2O_3)_y(SiO_2)_{1-x-y} or (MO)_x(Al_2O_3)_y(SiO_2)_{1-x-y} along the 50 mol% SiO_2 tie-line for p = 1.0. en public cc_by

Fig3a_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v2.agr

data 15652 2 51202 document 15652 Fig3b_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p77_v2.agr text/plain efbae94bbf4e9b516b92c306c3533714 MD5 54736 2022-02-01 15:52:04 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/53/Fig3b_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p77_v2.agr 1093 53 53 text/plain other Figure 3b shows the predictions of the structural model for glassy (M_2O)_x(Al_2O_3)_y(SiO_2)_{1-x-y} or (MO)_x(Al_2O_3)_y(SiO_2)_{1-x-y} along the 50 mol% SiO_2 tie-line for p = 0.77. en public cc_by

Fig3b_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p77_v2.agr

data 15653 2 51204 document 15653 Fig4_f_Al4_vs_R_v6.agr text/plain b34ec66a4c6a0e9bb0fa5183e91555fe MD5 121467 2022-02-01 15:53:15 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/54/Fig4_f_Al4_vs_R_v6.agr 1093 54 54 text/plain other Figure 4 shows the dependence of f_{Al(IV)} on R found from ^{27}Al MAS NMR experiments on M^+ or M^{2+} aluminosilicate glasses. en public cc_by

Fig4_f_Al4_vs_R_v6.agr

data 15654 2 51206 document 15654 Fig5_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr text/plain b61ed51f54c66e96b70704b6b2521170 MD5 27778 2022-02-01 15:53:39 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/55/Fig5_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr 1093 55 55 text/plain other Figure 5 shows the dependence of <f_{Al(IV)}> as evaluated for R >= 1 and p = 2<f_{Al(IV)}>-1 on the field strength F_M of the M^+ or M^{2+} ions in aluminosilicate glasses. en public cc_by

Fig5_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr

data 15655 2 51208 document 15655 Fig6_f_NBO_comparison.agr text/plain 8ec49f79e236e97991fedb032861f32c MD5 18224 2022-02-01 15:54:13 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/56/Fig6_f_NBO_comparison.agr 1093 56 56 text/plain other Figure 6 shows a comparison of the measured or simulated versus calculated values of f_{NBO} for KAS, NaAS, BaAS and CaAS glasses. en public cc_by

Fig6_f_NBO_comparison.agr

data 15656 2 51210 document 15656 Fig7_fNBO_vs_R_v5.agr text/plain b9c4c35df2c74cd2dfa1248201444f88 MD5 81254 2022-02-01 15:54:36 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/57/Fig7_fNBO_vs_R_v5.agr 1093 57 57 text/plain other Figure 7 shows the dependence of f_{NBO} on the ratio R for different M^+ or M^{2+} aluminosilicate glasses. en public cc_by

Fig7_fNBO_vs_R_v5.agr

data 15657 2 51212 document 15657 Fig8_fNBO_per_ion_vs_R_v5.agr text/plain 7ab7eb691de7dfd539e9182a340ff999 MD5 104684 2022-02-01 15:54:59 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/58/Fig8_fNBO_per_ion_vs_R_v5.agr 1093 58 58 text/plain other Figure 8 shows the dependence of N_{NBO}/N_{M + Al_(mcc)} on the ratio R for different M^+ or M^{2+} aluminosilicate glasses. en public cc_by

Fig8_fNBO_per_ion_vs_R_v5.agr

data 15658 2 51214 document 15658 Fig9_29Si_NMR_v4.agr text/plain 0b20b2f2e6cd6d5db5b6858cd32cfa05 MD5 31147 2022-02-01 15:55:25 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/59/Fig9_29Si_NMR_v4.agr 1093 59 59 text/plain other Figure 9 shows the dependence of N_{NBO}/N_{Si} on the ratio R for the NaAS glasses investigated by Maekawa et al. and Mysen et al. en public cc_by

Fig9_29Si_NMR_v4.agr

data 15659 2 51216 document 15659 Fig10_Qnav_vs_Qnav_v3.agr text/plain 26cac54f197db34b755542e69e1d47fc MD5 21728 2022-02-01 15:55:49 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/60/Fig10_Qnav_vs_Qnav_v3.agr 1093 60 60 text/plain other Comparison of the measured versus calculated values of N_{BO}/N_{Si}. en public cc_by

Fig10_Qnav_vs_Qnav_v3.agr

data 15660 2 51218 document 15660 Fig11a_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v3.agr text/plain 074735d561b721e8e9ee17caface2831 MD5 54041 2022-02-01 15:56:32 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/61/Fig11a_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v3.agr 1093 61 61 text/plain other Figure 11a shows the predictions of model I for glassy (M_2O_3)_x(Al_2O_3)_y(SiO_2)_{1-x-y} along the 50 mol% SiO_2 tie-line for p = 1.0. en public cc_by

Fig11a_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v3.agr

data 15661 3 51220 document 15661 Fig11b_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p64_v4.agr text/plain 59978b045e3990e3832efd3b291964b3 MD5 50930 2022-02-01 15:57:08 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/62/Fig11b_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p64_v4.agr 1093 62 62 text/plain other Figure 11b shows the predictions of model I for glassy (M_2O_3)_x(Al_2O_3)_y(SiO_2)_{1-x-y} along the 50 mol% SiO_2 tie-line for p = 0.64. en public cc_by

Fig11b_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p64_v4.agr

data 15662 2 51222 document 15662 Fig12_f_Al4_vs_R_RE_v4.agr text/plain 604afc40e2d9ed5fc1b5403344343167 MD5 69006 2022-02-01 15:57:32 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/63/Fig12_f_Al4_vs_R_RE_v4.agr 1093 63 63 text/plain other Figure 12 shows the dependence of f_{Al(IV)} on R found from ^{27}Al MAS NMR experiments on M^{3+} aluminosilicate glasses. en public cc_by

Fig12_f_Al4_vs_R_RE_v4.agr

data 15663 3 51224 document 15663 Fig13_RE_gamma_and_Al4_vs_CFS_v2.agr text/plain 3ce91de5162b14cb64d84431a400feb8 MD5 25767 2022-02-01 15:57:59 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/64/Fig13_RE_gamma_and_Al4_vs_CFS_v2.agr 1093 64 64 text/plain other Figure 13 shows the dependence of <f_{Al(IV)}> as evaluated for R >= 1/3 on the field strength F_M of the M^{3+} ions in aluminosilicate glasses. en public cc_by

Fig13_RE_gamma_and_Al4_vs_CFS_v2.agr

data 15664 2 51226 document 15664 Fig14_RE_f_NBO_comparison_v3.agr text/plain 903a6c0ebf50dc64282d371e1830c7ec MD5 31047 2022-02-01 15:58:29 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/65/Fig14_RE_f_NBO_comparison_v3.agr 1093 65 65 text/plain other Figure 14 shows a comparison of the measured versus calculated values of f_{NBO} for LaAS, YAS, LuAS and ScAS glasses. en public cc_by

Fig14_RE_f_NBO_comparison_v3.agr

data 15665 2 51228 document 15665 Fig15_RE_fNBO_vs_R_v4.agr text/plain 269dd0de98dd5f0007737c025deb9917 MD5 81474 2022-02-01 15:58:55 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/66/Fig15_RE_fNBO_vs_R_v4.agr 1093 66 66 text/plain other Figure 15 shows the dependence of f_{NBO} on the ratio R for different M^{3+} aluminosilicate glasses. en public cc_by

Fig15_RE_fNBO_vs_R_v4.agr

data 15666 2 51230 document 15666 Fig16_RE_fNBO_per_ion_vs_R_v5.agr text/plain 66ba0a4af11e768b96c9f72ac75aa8d2 MD5 62071 2022-02-01 15:59:26 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/67/Fig16_RE_fNBO_per_ion_vs_R_v5.agr 1093 67 67 text/plain other Figure 16 shows the dependence of N_{NBO}/N_{M + Al_(mcc)} on the ratio R for (a) LaAS, (b) YAS, (c) LuAs and (d) ScAS glasses. en public cc_by

Fig16_RE_fNBO_per_ion_vs_R_v5.agr

data 15667 2 51232 document 15667 Fig17a_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v1.agr text/plain f2b4ec6240573bf5bf4debaf2837b2b3 MD5 48273 2022-02-01 15:59:53 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/68/Fig17a_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v1.agr 1093 68 68 text/plain other Figure 17a shows the predictions of model II for glassy (M_2O_3)_x(Al_2O_3)_y(SiO_2)_{1-x-y} along the 50 mol% SiO_2 tie-line for p = 1.0. en public cc_by

Fig17a_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_1p0_v1.agr

data 15668 2 51234 document 15668 Fig17b_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p82_v1.agr text/plain fc5a1e62231716da7e9a2d481ba166b7 MD5 49797 2022-02-01 16:00:28 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/69/Fig17b_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p82_v1.agr 1093 69 69 text/plain other Figure 17b shows the predictions of model II for glassy (M_2O_3)_x(Al_2O_3)_y(SiO_2)_{1-x-y} along the 50 mol% SiO_2 tie-line for p = 0.82. en public cc_by

Fig17b_RE_Model_50molpercent_SiO2_gamma_0p82_v1.agr

data archive 479 disk0/00/00/10/93 2022-02-08 15:55:51 2024-07-22 10:43:27 2022-02-08 15:55:51 data_collection show Salmon Philip P.S.Salmon@bath.ac.uk 0000-0001-8671-1011 University of Bath TRUE Zeidler Anita A.Zeidler@bath.ac.uk 0000-0001-6501-8525 University of Bath FALSE WorkPackageLeader Youngman Randall E youngmanre@corning.com 0000-0002-6647-9865 Corning BS0050 CG0020 GE0030 dept_physics The files are labelled according to the corresponding figure numbers. The units for each axis are identified on the plots. Data sets used to prepare Figures 1-17 in the Journal of Chemical Physics article entitled "Structural model for amorphous aluminosilicates." The data sets describe the structure of various aluminosilicate glasses. 2022-02-08 University of Bath public RightsHolder University of Bath Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000266 EP/L015544/1 EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Condensed Matter Physics Royal Society https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000288 DH140152 Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellowship - Rational Design of Glassy Materials with Technological Applications cent_nan The data sets were collected using the methods described in the published paper. The data sets were analysed using the methods described in the published paper. The figures were prepared using QtGrace (https://sourceforge.net/projects/qtgrace/). The data set corresponding to a plotted curve within an QtGrace file can be identified by clicking on that curve. 2017-01-01 2021-12-18 en 1 10.15125/BATH-01093 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0079607 pub open Dataset