<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/15655'>
    <docid>15655</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/51208'>
        <fileid>51208</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>15655</objectid>
        <filename>Fig6_f_NBO_comparison.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>8ec49f79e236e97991fedb032861f32c</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>18224</filesize>
        <mtime>2022-02-01 15:54:13</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1093/56/Fig6_f_NBO_comparison.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1093</eprintid>
    <pos>56</pos>
    <placement>56</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 6 shows a comparison of the measured or simulated versus calculated values of f_{NBO} for KAS, NaAS, BaAS and CaAS glasses.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig6_f_NBO_comparison.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
