<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/16891'>
    <docid>16891</docid>
    <rev_number>4</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/58659'>
        <fileid>58659</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>16891</objectid>
        <filename>Fig9_Rings_hot_vs_cold.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>826d22d2fad947ff44b55b8717d5922f</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>66485</filesize>
        <mtime>2023-01-11 17:03:47</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1106/28/Fig9_Rings_hot_vs_cold.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1106</eprintid>
    <pos>28</pos>
    <placement>10</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 9 shows the distributions of (a) and (b) King rings, (c) and (d) Guttman rings, or (e) and (f) primitive rings for the different polyamorphs of silica glass under cold compression at RT (left column) or hot compression at 7.7 GPa (right column).</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig9_Rings_hot_vs_cold.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
