<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/16334'>
    <docid>16334</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/54822'>
        <fileid>54822</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>16334</objectid>
        <filename>Fig16_CN_vs_Al2O3_60molpc_v4.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>c8106b98676bf48a733d479806cab1cd</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>46957</filesize>
        <mtime>2022-08-31 11:39:06</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1139/75/Fig16_CN_vs_Al2O3_60molpc_v4.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1139</eprintid>
    <pos>75</pos>
    <placement>75</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 16 shows the dependence of the (a) Al-O and (b) Mg-O coordination numbers on the mol% of alumina along the tie-line with 60 mol% silica.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig16_CN_vs_Al2O3_60molpc_v4.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
