<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/16393'>
    <docid>16393</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/55479'>
        <fileid>55479</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>16393</objectid>
        <filename>Fig11_bond_distance_vs_R_v3.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>fa518f7ecbcdaee12b622c973b59f2bc</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>62956</filesize>
        <mtime>2022-09-21 13:35:58</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1139/79/Fig11_bond_distance_vs_R_v3.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1139</eprintid>
    <pos>79</pos>
    <placement>79</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 11 shows the dependence of the (a) Si-O, (b) Al-O and (c) Mg-O bond distances on the ratio R.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig11_bond_distance_vs_R_v3.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
