<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/16076'>
    <docid>16076</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/53420'>
        <fileid>53420</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>16076</objectid>
        <filename>Fig19_NBO_vs_R.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>ace66c6decadf1d2a74c35da689a5e07</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>40135</filesize>
        <mtime>2022-05-30 16:38:17</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1139/49/Fig19_NBO_vs_R.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1139</eprintid>
    <pos>49</pos>
    <placement>49</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 19 shows the R dependence of (a) f_{NBO} along the 50 mol% silica tie line, (b) f_{NBO} along the 60 mol% silica tie line, and (c) the ratio N_{NBO}/[N_{Mg} + N_{Al_mcc}].</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig19_NBO_vs_R.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
