<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/16316'>
    <docid>16316</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/54758'>
        <fileid>54758</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>16316</objectid>
        <filename>Fig6_ratios_vs_R_v2.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>94c289ba316ebfef5f9e3fa59de01f74</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>30135</filesize>
        <mtime>2022-08-29 15:54:47</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1192/8/Fig6_ratios_vs_R_v2.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1192</eprintid>
    <pos>8</pos>
    <placement>8</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 6 shows the R dependence of the ratios N_{Si-O-Al}/N_{Si}, N_{NBO}/N_{Si} (p = 1) and N_{NBO}/N_{Si-O-Al} for the standard model of aluminosilicate glass.  The ratio N_{NBO}/N_{Si} for the GYZAS model of magnesium aluminosilicates with p = 0.77 is also given. The ratios are calculated for tie-lines with either 50 mol% silica (left column) or 60 mol% silica (right column).</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig6_ratios_vs_R_v2.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
