<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/17239'>
    <docid>17239</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/61553'>
        <fileid>61553</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>17239</objectid>
        <filename>Fig22_NBO_vs_R_v2.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>998da9f63963ed7f2665958f92cf5345</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>75490</filesize>
        <mtime>2023-06-25 15:20:55</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1200/101/Fig22_NBO_vs_R_v2.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1200</eprintid>
    <pos>101</pos>
    <placement>101</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 22 shows the R dependence of (a) f_{NBO} along the 50 mol% silica tie line, (b) f_{NBO} along the 60 mol% silica tie line, and (c) the ratio N_{NBO}/[N_{Mg} + N_{Al_(mcc)}].</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig22_NBO_vs_R_v2.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
