<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/17718'>
    <docid>17718</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/65254'>
        <fileid>65254</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>17718</objectid>
        <filename>Fig17_bulk_modulus_vs_p_v5.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>e61b5aab048321a0b29853931dd543bf</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>61588</filesize>
        <mtime>2024-01-02 15:28:34</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1238/58/Fig17_bulk_modulus_vs_p_v5.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1238</eprintid>
    <pos>58</pos>
    <placement>58</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 17 shows the pressure dependence of the bulk modulus for glassy MgAS_37.5_50, MgSiO3, SiO_2, and the silicates LiAlSi_3O_8, NaAlSi_3O_8, KAlSi_3O_8 and Na_2MgSi_6O_{14}.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig17_bulk_modulus_vs_p_v5.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
