<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/17390'>
    <docid>17390</docid>
    <rev_number>3</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/63066'>
        <fileid>63066</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>17390</objectid>
        <filename>265010 21-0028 Favourable Opinion Letter re issue 16.02.2021.pdf</filename>
        <mime_type>application/pdf</mime_type>
        <hash>96e36422c38676510d6c846700f086b6</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>148860</filesize>
        <mtime>2023-09-24 14:41:04</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1326/5/265010%2021-0028%20Favourable%20Opinion%20Letter%20re%20issue%2016.02.2021.pdf</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1326</eprintid>
    <pos>5</pos>
    <placement>5</placement>
    <mime_type>application/pdf</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Ethical approval.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>invisible</security>
    <license>all_rights_reserved</license>
    <main>265010 21-0028 Favourable Opinion Letter re issue 16.02.2021.pdf</main>
    <content>ethics</content>
  </document>
</documents>
