1369 59 17736 5 65498 document 17736 NATO Final stata 20240202.dta application/octet-stream d3b6e4698140afd33acf82d9c782b06b MD5 35035 2024-02-02 13:31:32 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1369/1/NATO%20Final%20stata%2020240202.dta 1369 1 1 application/octet-stream other This is the Stata 17 datasets of a data package in which the focus is on the arguments presented by 40 leading analysts of European security in their arguments for their view on whether NATO enlargement was a mistake. The selection of the experts was done by the Foreign Affairs journal that published an opinion survey of 62 experts of which 40 published their arguments in addition to their opinions in this survey publication of Foreign Affairs (Foreign Affairs Survey 2022). en public cc_by

NATO Final stata 20240202.dta

data 17737 4 65501 document 17737 Review of premises of the NATO debate (NVivo R1.6).nvp application/x-dbt 26de5a8a05c8356108bc0ccb721a013a MD5 22216704 2024-02-02 13:32:56 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1369/2/Review%20of%20premises%20of%20the%20NATO%20debate%20%28NVivo%20R1.6%29.nvp 1369 2 2 application/x-dbt other In this NVivo 12 textual analysis package file the focus is on the arguments presented by 40 leading analysts of European security in their arguments for their view on whether NATO enlargement was a mistake. These arguments by 40 of the 62 surveyed experts is the textual material of this dataset. The textual data was coded to reveal premises of these experts. en public cc_by

Review of premises of the NATO debate (NVivo R1.6).nvp

data 17996 4 67191 document 17996 Codebook 20240202 .docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document b85a8adff95eb5af478b5fbbf6fe5a0a MD5 27863 2024-05-13 10:50:39 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1369/3/Codebook%2020240202%20.docx 1369 3 3 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document other This is the codebook related to the dataset. It explains the nature of the data, the coding rules, and the variables. It also instructs about the sources of the data and instructs on the use and referencing to this data. en public cc_by

Codebook 20240202 .docx

code 17997 3 67194 document 17997 indexcodes.txt text/plain 7db6f72739dd47383cdcf09dd65dacdb MD5 3454 2024-05-13 10:51:10 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1369/4/indexcodes.txt 1369 4 4 text/plain other Generate index codes conversion from other to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/17996 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/17996 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/17996 archive 5876 disk0/00/00/13/69 2024-06-06 14:39:14 2025-01-16 09:59:56 2024-06-06 14:39:14 data_collection show Kivimäki Timo T.A.Kivimaki@bath.ac.uk 0000-0002-1735-9170 University of Bath TRUE JE0020 dept_mod_lang NATO Enlargement, theoretical premises, relational analysis, agent-centricity, power-centricity In this NVivo 12 textual analysis package files and Stata 17 datasets, the focus is on the arguments presented by 40 leading analysts of European security in their arguments for their view on whether NATO enlargement was a mistake. The selection of the experts was done by the Foreign Affairs journal that published an opinion survey of 62 experts of which 40 published their arguments in addition to their opinions in this survey publication of Foreign Affairs (Foreign Affairs Survey 2022). These arguments by 40 of the 62 surveyed experts is the textual material of this dataset. The textual data was coded to reveal premises of these experts. The coding was based on distinctions that the creator of this dataset created on the basis of literature reviewed in his article “Theoretical Premises of Support of and Opposition to NATO Enlargement.” 2024-06-05 University of Bath public RightsHolder University of Bath University of Bath https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000835 The data was compiled by using NVivo 12 textual analysis package to code texts and measure levels of various theoretical premises. The quantitative results of the textual analysis were then statistically analysed by using Stata 17 program package. NVivo 12 textual analysis package and Stata 17 statistical analysis package. en 1 10.15125/BATH-01369 https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2352569 pub open Dataset