<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19661'>
    <docid>19661</docid>
    <rev_number>2</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/80085'>
        <fileid>80085</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>19661</objectid>
        <filename>FigS7_Dofr_ND_expt_vs_AIMD_v2.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>4616dac3cd87c1db4d80f22f79efa9a2</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>216407</filesize>
        <mtime>2025-11-10 17:29:39</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1590/31/FigS7_Dofr_ND_expt_vs_AIMD_v2.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1590</eprintid>
    <pos>31</pos>
    <placement>31</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure S7 compares the measured and simulated D&apos;_N(r) functions for the x = 0.750 glass. The simulated D_N(r) function is also shown.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>FigS7_Dofr_ND_expt_vs_AIMD_v2.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
