<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<documents xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0"><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19925"><docid>19925</docid><rev_number>4</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81902"><fileid>81902</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19925</objectid><filename>Fig2_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>c19738a6507c8254d5e044fa48f78a3c</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>27799</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:02:32</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/1/Fig2_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>1</pos><placement>1</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 2 shows the cation field strength dependence of the parameter p = 〈f_{Al(IV)}〉 and the aluminium avoidance parameter Q.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig2_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19926"><docid>19926</docid><rev_number>3</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81904"><fileid>81904</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19926</objectid><filename>Fig3_fNBO_vs_R_v6.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>86f0af4a4b6fc993420f9095ec4e674c</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>89848</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:04:24</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/2/Fig3_fNBO_vs_R_v6.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>2</pos><placement>2</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 3 shows the dependence of f_NBO on the ratio R for several aluminosilicate systems along tie-lines with constant SiO2 content.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig3_fNBO_vs_R_v6.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19927"><docid>19927</docid><rev_number>2</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81906"><fileid>81906</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19927</objectid><filename>Fig4_M-O_params_vs_1overR.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>a655263b225c81390a27d1aca52a6db9</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>52783</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:05:32</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/3/Fig4_M-O_params_vs_1overR.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>3</pos><placement>3</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 4 shows the dependence of the mean M-O (M = Zn or Mg) bond distances and coordination numbers on 1/R for (a) and (b) ZnAS glasses and (c) and (d) MgAS glasses.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig4_M-O_params_vs_1overR.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19928"><docid>19928</docid><rev_number>3</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81908"><fileid>81908</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19928</objectid><filename>Fig5a_fNBO_vs_density_all_Al.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>10f3a10a6f9a06feba77308209051841</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>35635</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:07:08</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/4/Fig5a_fNBO_vs_density_all_Al.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>4</pos><placement>4</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 5(a) shows the dependence of f_NBO on the reduced density for depolymerised aluminosilicate glasses.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig5a_fNBO_vs_density_all_Al.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19929"><docid>19929</docid><rev_number>3</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81910"><fileid>81910</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19929</objectid><filename>Fig5b_fNBO_vs_Al-O_CN_all_Al.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>5d53d49762ba671dc6c531b374c2019e</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>36205</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:08:16</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/5/Fig5b_fNBO_vs_Al-O_CN_all_Al.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>5</pos><placement>5</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 5(b) shows the dependence of f_NBO on the Al-O coordination number for depolymerised aluminosilicate glasses.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig5b_fNBO_vs_Al-O_CN_all_Al.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19930"><docid>19930</docid><rev_number>2</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81912"><fileid>81912</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19930</objectid><filename>Fig6_O2_vs_O3_density_v5.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>770c70adf461fab2c4117752e5a5a3fd</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>117997</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:09:47</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/6/Fig6_O2_vs_O3_density_v5.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>6</pos><placement>6</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 6 shows the reduced density dependence of the fractions of NBO, BO and TBO species in aluminosilicate glasses.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig6_O2_vs_O3_density_v5.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19932"><docid>19932</docid><rev_number>3</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81916"><fileid>81916</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19932</objectid><filename>Fig8_Tg_vs_x_v5.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>1a500129fd6ff173f9f83408533f4d20</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>30910</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:14:28</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/8/Fig8_Tg_vs_x_v5.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>8</pos><placement>8</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 8 shows the composition dependence of the glass transition temperature T_g for glassy (Nb2O5)_x(NaPO3)_{1-x}.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig8_Tg_vs_x_v5.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19933"><docid>19933</docid><rev_number>3</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81918"><fileid>81918</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19933</objectid><filename>Fig9_NBO_per_Nb_v2.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>5b6fac9f39c8a6dbafd34d0e29952a2d</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>17744</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:15:31</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/9/Fig9_NBO_per_Nb_v2.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>9</pos><placement>9</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 9 shows the composition dependence of the N_{NBO}/N_Nb ratio for glassy (Nb2O5)_x(NaPO3)_{1-x}.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig9_NBO_per_Nb_v2.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19934"><docid>19934</docid><rev_number>2</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81920"><fileid>81920</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19934</objectid><filename>Fig10_O-packing_v3.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>b7cdb8e5fbafe9766d350a7a1c88f041</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>110455</filesize><mtime>2026-02-20 09:16:41</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/10/Fig10_O-packing_v3.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>10</pos><placement>10</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 10 shows the A-O coordination number for network-forming motifs (A = B, Ge, Si, or Si and Al) versus the oxygen packing fraction for several glassy and liquid oxide systems under pressure. The data points for several room temperature crystalline polymorphs of B2O3, GeO2, and SiO2 are also shown.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig10_O-packing_v3.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document><document id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19943"><docid>19943</docid><rev_number>3</rev_number><files><file id="https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/82177"><fileid>82177</fileid><datasetid>document</datasetid><objectid>19943</objectid><filename>Fig7_Nb2O5-NaPO3_speciation_v2.agr</filename><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><hash>c532dd601c6738b9c8e96c9e8ca55a29</hash><hash_type>MD5</hash_type><filesize>53923</filesize><mtime>2026-03-01 16:06:37</mtime><url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/11/Fig7_Nb2O5-NaPO3_speciation_v2.agr</url><data encoding="base64"></data></file></files><eprintid>1656</eprintid><pos>11</pos><placement>7</placement><mime_type>text/plain</mime_type><format>other</format><formatdesc>Figure 7 shows the composition dependence of (a) N_{NBO}/N_P,  (b) N_{PONb}/N_P, (c) N_{POP}/N_P, and (d) f_{NbONb} for glassy (Nb2O5)_x(NaPO3)_{1-x}.</formatdesc><language>en</language><security>public</security><license>cc_by</license><main>Fig7_Nb2O5-NaPO3_speciation_v2.agr</main><date_embargo></date_embargo><date_embargo_retained></date_embargo_retained><embargo_reason></embargo_reason><content>data</content><relation></relation><media></media></document></documents>
