<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<documents xmlns='http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0'>
  <document id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/19925'>
    <docid>19925</docid>
    <rev_number>4</rev_number>
    <files>
      <file id='https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/file/81902'>
        <fileid>81902</fileid>
        <datasetid>document</datasetid>
        <objectid>19925</objectid>
        <filename>Fig2_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr</filename>
        <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
        <hash>c19738a6507c8254d5e044fa48f78a3c</hash>
        <hash_type>MD5</hash_type>
        <filesize>27799</filesize>
        <mtime>2026-02-20 09:02:32</mtime>
        <url>https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/1656/1/Fig2_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr</url>
      </file>
    </files>
    <eprintid>1656</eprintid>
    <pos>1</pos>
    <placement>1</placement>
    <mime_type>text/plain</mime_type>
    <format>other</format>
    <formatdesc>Figure 2 shows the cation field strength dependence of the parameter p = 〈f_{Al(IV)}〉 and the aluminium avoidance parameter Q.</formatdesc>
    <language>en</language>
    <security>public</security>
    <license>cc_by</license>
    <main>Fig2_gamma_and_Q_vs_CFS_v3.agr</main>
    <content>data</content>
  </document>
</documents>
