421 53 6899 2 17861 document 6899 EMT_Repository.zip application/zip 4b3d2f97732d5d76bcbbedf0c14c7b73 MD5 50542921 2017-09-08 10:45:04 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/421/1/EMT_Repository.zip 421 1 1 application/zip other en public cc_by

EMT_Repository.zip

data 8810 1 24314 document 8810 readme.txt text/plain 99f1d66f9c9804986121b8153981dc11 MD5 2145 2018-04-12 13:22:09 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/421/2/readme.txt 421 2 2 text/plain other en public

readme.txt

documentation 8811 1 24317 document 8811 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ 8b4c02868522c9bc9e2e32df324e7395 MD5 891 2018-04-12 13:22:39 https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/421/3/indexcodes.txt 421 3 3 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from other to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/8810 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/8810 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/document/8810 archive 5986 disk0/00/00/04/21 2018-04-13 08:20:32 2024-07-18 12:31:41 2018-04-13 08:20:32 data_collection show Nearchou Antony A.Nearchou@bath.ac.uk University of Bath TRUE GE0030 GE0040 dept_chem This dataset contains powder X-ray diffraction data, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy data (29-Si, 27-Al and 23-Na nuclei), used in the article 'Systematic approaches towards template-free synthesis of EMT-type zeolites'. Herein, research is performed to attempt to synthesise EMT-type zeolites without organic templates, and the influence of the crystallisation process on the amount of organic template is probed. The powder X-ray diffraction data were used to index and identify the structure of the relevant zeolite samples. The SEM images were used to characterise the morphology and size of the crystals/particles produced using the different synthesis batch compositions used in the article. The NMR data of the 29-Si nuclei was used to determine the Si/Al ratio of the relevant samples, and the 27-Al and 23-Na nuclei were used to determine the different environments of these two nuclei in the different samples produced. 2018-04-13 University of Bath public RightsHolder University of Bath Royal Society https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000288 UF090287 Royal Society University Research Fellowship (Asel Sartbaeva) Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000266 EP/K004956/1 Applying Long-Lived Metastable States in Switchable Functionality via Kinetic Control of Molecular Assembly - a Programme in Functional Materials Powder X-ray diffraction data were collected using the Bruker D8-Advance X-ray powder diffractometer at the CCAF (Chemical Characterisation and Analysis Facility) at the University of Bath, using a Cu K(alpha) (1.5418 A) radiation source. Unit cell parameters were calculated using the program UnitCell by Holland and Redfern. Scanning electron microscope images were taken using the JEOL SEM6480LV microscope at the MAS (Microscopy Analysis Suite) at the University of Bath. Magic-angle solid state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (on 29-Si, 27-Al and 23-Na nuclei) were performed at the previously EPSRC-sponsored NMR service at Durham University. This was using a Varian VNMRS 400 spectrometer. Within the relevant article, a parameter called the "omega value" is defined. This is used to qualitatively compare the crystallinity of the zeolite phases produced using a quick and simplistic method. To begin with, the first three Bragg peaks of the EMT frameworks were deconvoluted - these being the [100], [002] and [101] peaks. Upon deconvolution, the peaks were fitted to Gaussian curves, and the peak area consequently calculated. Next, the area of each Bragg peak was divided by the area of the equivalent peak in the zeolite sample prepared using the standard procedure, giving a peak area ratio. For each sample, an average of the ratio for each of the three peaks was taken, and dubbed the "omega value". As the standard procedure sample was compared to itself, it was reported as having an "omega value" of "1.0". An explanation of this calculation is also contained within the article. https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/5d9667d4-017f-485c-b2d1-cd974e290f3c 2015-02-15 2016-09-01 en 1 10.15125/BATH-00421 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.036 pub open Data licenced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International