This document lists and describes the research data supporting the article tiled "Rational whole-life carbon assessment using a dynamic climate model: Comparison of a concrete, steel and timber building structure".		

Authored by:
Will Hawkins*, Samuel Cooper, Stephen Allen, Jonathan Roynon, Tim Ibell
			
*Corresponding author

Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering,
University of Bath.

wh604@bath.ac.uk

Created: 15/9/2020

----------------------------------File 1----------------------------------
File Name: 1_climate_impact_gasses.csv
Description: Yearly climate impact comparison of CO2, CH4 and N2O.
Row Headings: gas (row 1); result description (row 2); units (row 3); value (rows 4-1004)
Notes: 
 - This data is plotted in Figure 1.

----------------------------------File 2----------------------------------
File Name: 2_carbon_flux_buildings.csv
Description: Annual carbon fluxes for concrete, steel and timber building options. 
Column Headings: result description (row 1); units (row 2); results (rows 3-27)
Notes: 
 - Three timber scenarios are: with sequestration, without sequestration, and with both sequestration and BECCS.
 - This data is plotted in Figure 2.

----------------------------------File 3----------------------------------
File Name: 3_climate_impact_buildings.csv
Description: Yearly climate impact comparison of concrete, steel and timber building options.  
Row Headings: building material (row 1); result description (row 2); units (row 3); value (rows 4-1004)
Notes: 
 - Three timber scenarios are: with sequestration, without sequestration, and with both sequestration and BECCS.
 - This data is plotted in Figure 3.