Data from: A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products.

Excel spreadsheet of evidence data - coded for relevance, publication status, independence and declaration of conflict of interest.

Cite this dataset as:
Hatchard, J., 2014. Data from: A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products. Dryad Digital Repository. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7dm1p/1.

Export

[QR code for this page]

Creators

Jenny Hatchard
University of Bath

Contributors

Anna Gilmore
Project Member
University of Bath

Karen Evans-Reeves
Project Member
University of Bath

University of Bath
Rights Holder

Coverage

Collection date(s):

13 March 2014

Geographical coverage:

UK

Funders

Medical Research Council
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000265

UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies
MR/K023195/1

Mapping Industry Political Activity Aimed at Opposing the Introduction of Plain Packaging and Examining its Impact on Policymakers
A15664

Publication details

Publication date: 13 March 2014
by: Dryad Digital Repository

Version: 1

Official landing page URL: http://datadryad.org/resource/doi:10.5061/dryad.7d...

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7dm1p/1

URL for this record: https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/eprint/177

Related papers and books

Hatchard, J. L., Fooks, G. J., Evans-Reeves, K. A., Ulucanlar, S., and Gilmore, A. B., 2014. A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products. BMJ Open, 4(2), e003757. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003757.

Contact information

Please contact the Research Data Service in the first instance for all matters concerning this item.

Contact person: Jenny Hatchard

Departments:

Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences
Health