Justification in Judgment
This dataset contains the data from two experiments investigating to what degree process accountability motivates decision makers to shift from retrieval of past exemplars to rule-based integration processes. The first experiment concerns retrieval-based configural judgement tasks, while the second concerns elemental judgement tasks requiring weighing and integrating information. The data includes results from both training trials and test trials, the images used for pictorial stimuli, the code needed to run the experiments in PsychoPy, and the code used to analyse the results in R.
Cite this dataset as:
Hoffmann, J.,
von Helversen, B.,
Gaissmaier, W.,
2017.
Justification in Judgment.
Open Science Framework (OSF).
Available from: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7NMWS.
Export
Creators
Janina Hoffmann
University of Bath; University of Basel; University of Konstanz
Bettina von Helversen
University of Basel; University of Zurich
Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Max Planck Institute for Human Development; University of Konstanz
Contributors
University of Bath
Rights Holder
Documentation
Data collection method:
For details of the data collection methodology, see the associated publication.
Technical details and requirements:
Experiments were run in PsycoPy (https://www.psychopy.org/) and analyses were conducted in R.
Methodology link:
Hoffmann, J. A., Gaissmaier, W., and von Helversen, B., 2017. Justifying the judgment process affects neither judgment accuracy, nor strategy use. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(6), 627-641. Available from: http://journal.sjdm.org/17/17411/jdm17411.pdf.
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001711
Modeling Human Judgment: Integrating Memory and Rule-based Processes
146169
Publication details
Publication date: 4 September 2017
by: Open Science Framework (OSF)
Version: 1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7NMWS
URL for this record: https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/803
Related papers and books
Hoffmann, J. A., Gaissmaier, W., and von Helversen, B., 2017. Justifying the judgment process affects neither judgment accuracy, nor strategy use. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(6), 627-641. Available from: http://journal.sjdm.org/17/17411/jdm17411.pdf.
Contact information
Please contact the Research Data Service in the first instance for all matters concerning this item.
Contact person: Janina Hoffmann
Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences
Psychology
