Dataset for ORCID EPrints Implementation

A survey canvassing user requirements for integration of EPrints software with the ORCID service was circulated to four mailing lists. Although the target audience was the UK EPrints user community, the survey was open to anyone, so included a number of international responses. This dataset includes an anonymised version of the download of results from Bristol Online Surveys and a copy of the survey form.

Keywords:

orcid eprints api web services persistent identifiers user requirements

Subjects:

Library and information studies

Information and Knowledge Management

Cite this dataset as:
Jennings, L., Cooper, H., 2016. Dataset for ORCID EPrints Implementation. Bath: University of Bath Research Data Archive. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15125/BATH-00253.

Export

Data

results-for … anonymised.csv
text/plain (25kB)
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

All data available under a CC-BY 4.0 licence

Creators

Lizz Jennings
University of Bath

0000-0002-4052-3602

Helen Cooper
University of Central Lancashire

0000-0002-2968-4747

Contributors

University of Bath
Rights Holder

University of Central Lancashire
Rights Holder

Coverage

Collection date(s):

From 15 July 2016 to 31 August 2016

Documentation

Data collection method:

A survey was circulated to four mailing lists - eprints-uk-user-group@googlegroups.com, eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk, ORCID-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK, UKCORR-DISCUSSION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Although the target audience was the UK EPrints user community, the survey was open to anyone, so included a number of international responses. A copy of the survey form is included with the dataset. Analysis was taken from the Bristol Online Surveys tool. No further processing was carried out.

Data processing and preparation activities:

Data has been redacted as follows: Institution names have been replaced with a country. Job roles have been removed Other data points in free text comments that would identify a respondent, an individual or an institution have been replaced with a generic term (e.g. [deleted name]).

Additional information:

Columns have the full text of the question. Additionally, a copy of the original survey has been provided for information. Some observations in the report are based on email correspondence which is unsuitable for sharing.