Dataset for "Non-locking screw insertion: no benefit seen if tightness exceeds 80% of the maximum torque"
Screws are the most commonly used orthopaedic implant, however they are frequently overtightened when inserted. Using screw, bone and screw hole characteristics, maximum torque for a screw hole is predicted prior to insertion. Using this, optimum tightness as a percentage of the maximum torque is investigated as functions of compression and pullout forces. This data set provides the raw data for these investigations. The methodology is described in detail in the related manuscript: Fletcher, J., Ehrhardt, B., MacLeod, A., Whitehouse, M., Gill, H. & Preatoni, E. 2019. Non-locking screw insertion: No benefit seen if tightness exceeds 80% of the maximum torque. Clinical Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.009
Cite this dataset as:
Fletcher, J.,
Ehrhardt, B.,
MacLeod, A.,
Whitehouse, M.,
Gill, H.,
Preatoni, E.,
2019.
Dataset for "Non-locking screw insertion: no benefit seen if tightness exceeds 80% of the maximum torque".
Bath: University of Bath Research Data Archive.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.15125/BATH-00660.
Export
Data
Non-locking … insertion data.xlsx
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet (65kB)
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Raw data for: Fletcher, J., Ehrhardt, B., MacLeod, A., Whitehouse, M., Gill, H. & Preatoni, E. 2019. Non-locking screw insertion: No benefit seen if tightness exceeds 80% of the maximum torque. Clinical Biomechanics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.009
Creators
James Fletcher
University of Bath
Beate Ehrhardt
University of Bath
Alisdair MacLeod
University of Bath
Michael R. Whitehouse
University of Bristol
Harinderjit Gill
University of Bath
Ezio Preatoni
University of Bath
Contributors
University of Bath
Rights Holder
Documentation
Data collection method:
Biomechanical testing using juvenile bovine bone
Technical details and requirements:
'R' software, v3.3.3 (R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
Documentation Files
Explanation … insertion.docx
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document (15kB)
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Raw data description
Funders
Royal College of Surgeons of England
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000297
Fellowship for James Fletcher - Optimal surgical techniques to reduce screw failure in fragility fractures
David Telling Charitable Trust
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100020276
Improving Fracture Fixation - The Role of Insertion Forces on Construct Stability
Publication details
Publication date: 9 July 2019
by: University of Bath
Version: 1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15125/BATH-00660
URL for this record: https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/id/eprint/660
Related papers and books
Fletcher, J. W.A., Ehrhardt, B., MacLeod, A., Whitehouse, M. R., Gill, H., and Preatoni, E., 2019. Non-locking screw insertion: No benefit seen if tightness exceeds 80% of the maximum torque. Clinical Biomechanics, 70, 40-45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.009.
Contact information
Please contact the Research Data Service in the first instance for all matters concerning this item.
Contact person: James Fletcher
Faculty of Engineering & Design
Mechanical Engineering
Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences
Health
Research Centres & Institutes
Centre for Orthopaedic Biomechanics
Institute for Mathematical Innovation (IMI)